首页> 外文OA文献 >An economic evaluation of irbesartan in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and nephropathy: cost-effectiveness of Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) in the Belgian and French settings
【2h】

An economic evaluation of irbesartan in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and nephropathy: cost-effectiveness of Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) in the Belgian and French settings

机译:厄贝沙坦治疗2型糖尿病,高血压和肾病患者的经济评价:厄贝沙坦在比利时和法国的糖尿病肾病试验(IDNT)中的成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. In the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), treatment with irbesartan demonstrated 23 and 20% reductions in the combined endpoint of doubling of serum creatinine (DSC), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy compared with amlodipine and control, respectively. A simulation model was developed to project long-term cost consequences of the IDNT in Belgium and France. Methods. A Markov model simulated progression from nephropathy to DSC, ESRD and death in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Treatment-specific probabilities were derived from IDNT. Country-specific ESRD-related data were retrieved from published sources. Delay in onset of ESRD, life expectancy and mean lifetime costs were calculated for patients with a baseline age of 59 years. Future costs were discounted at 3% per annum (p.a.), and clinical benefits were discounted at 0 and 3% p.a.. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. Results. Onset of ESRD was delayed with irbesartan by 1.41 and 1.35 years vs amlodipine and control, respectively. When a 10-year time horizon was considered, delay in ESRD onset led to anticipated improvements in life expectancy of 0.13 years vs amlodipine and 0.26 years vs control. Irbesartan was associated with cost savings of €14 949 and €9205/patient in Belgium, and €20 128 and €13 337 in France, vs amlodipine and control, respectively. The results were robust under a wide range of plausible assumptions. Conclusions. Treating patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy using irbesartan was both cost- and life-saving compared with amlodipine and control
机译:背景。在厄贝沙坦糖尿病肾病试验(IDNT)中,厄贝沙坦治疗可将2型高血压患者的血清肌酐(DSC)加倍,晚期肾病(ESRD)或死亡的综合终点分别降低23%和20%糖尿病和明显的肾病,分别与氨氯地平和对照组相比。开发了一个模拟模型来预测IDNT在比利时和法国的长期成本后果。方法。马尔可夫模型模拟了高血压,2型糖尿病和明显肾病患者从肾病到DSC,ESRD的死亡以及死亡。特定于治疗的概率来自IDNT。从公开来源检索与国家特定的ESRD相关数据。计算基线年龄为59岁的患者的ESRD发作延迟,预期寿命和平均寿命成本。未来成本折现为每年3%(p.a.),临床收益折现为0和3%p.a.。进行了广泛的敏感性分析。结果。与氨氯地平和对照组相比,厄贝沙坦使ESRD的发作分别延迟了1.41和1。35年。考虑到10年的时间跨度,ESRD发作的延迟导致预期的预期寿命比氨氯地平提高0.13年,而与对照相比则提高0.26年。与氨氯地平和对照组相比,厄贝沙坦在比利时为每位患者节省了14 949欧元和9205欧元,在法国节省了20 128欧元和13 337欧元。在各种合理的假设下,结果都是可靠的。结论。与氨氯地平和对照组相比,使用厄贝沙坦治疗高血压,2型糖尿病和明显的肾病患者既节省成本又节省生命

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号